AMD Radeon RX Vega vs AMD Radeon R7 260X

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega and AMD Radeon R7 260X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Video outputs and ports, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• 5x more texture fill rate: 307.2 GTexel / s vs 61.6 GTexel / s
• 4.6x more pipelines: 4096 vs 896
• 5x better floating-point performance: 9,830 gflops vs 1,971 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12297 vs 3192
• Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 882 vs 523
• 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 205.048 vs 43.745
• 5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3986.188 vs 804.436
• 4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.999 vs 3.673
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.468 vs 64.088
• 5.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1291.445 vs 221.539
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8455 vs 3358
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8455 vs 3358

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 260X

• Around 96% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 225 Watt
• Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3845 vs 2094
• Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3485 vs 2391
• Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3845 vs 2094
• Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3485 vs 2391

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 260X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	12297 3192
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	882 523
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	205.048 43.745
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3986.188 804.436
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17.999 3.673
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	215.468 64.088
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1291.445 221.539
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2094 3845
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2391 3485
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8455 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2094 3845
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2391 3485
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8455 3358

Compare specifications (specs)