AMD Radeon Vega 11 vs ATI Radeon Xpress 1150 IGP
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 11 and ATI Radeon Xpress 1150 IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 11
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 110 nm
- 61.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1842 vs 30
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 vs 192
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 vs 17 October 2007 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 110 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1842 vs 30 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 vs 192 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon Xpress 1150 IGP
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed | 400 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 11
GPU 2: ATI Radeon Xpress 1150 IGP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega 11 | ATI Radeon Xpress 1150 IGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1842 | 30 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 | 192 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13226 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.582 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 371.843 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.156 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.449 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 248.838 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2156 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2475 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2156 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2475 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Vega 11 | ATI Radeon Xpress 1150 IGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Rage 9 |
Code name | Owl | RS482 |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 | 17 October 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 903 | 906 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 400 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,830 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 110 nm |
Pipelines | 704 | |
Texture fill rate | 57.2 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.0 |