AMD Radeon Vega 11 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 11 and Intel UHD Graphics 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 11

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
• Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 99% higher texture fill rate: 57.2 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
• 29.3x more pipelines: 704 vs 24
• 4x better floating-point performance: 1,830 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
• Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1857 vs 1237
• Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 478 vs 299
• 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13318 vs 4657
• Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.582 vs 27.517
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 371.843 vs 354.254
• Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.156 vs 1.807
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.449 vs 20.323
• 8.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 248.838 vs 29.327
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2156 vs 1870
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2475 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 vs 3309
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2156 vs 1870
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2475 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 vs 3309

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Around 17% higher core clock speed: 350 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 11
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1857 1237
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	478 299
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	13318 4657
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	41.582 27.517
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	371.843 354.254
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.156 1.807
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	52.449 20.323
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	248.838 29.327
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2156 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2475 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3343 3309
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2156 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2475 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3343 3309

Compare specifications (specs)