AMD Radeon Vega 11 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon Vega 11 und Intel UHD Graphics 630 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, Speicher, API-Unterstützung, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon Vega 11
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 5 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 8% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1300 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Etwa 99% höhere Texturfüllrate: 57.2 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
- 29.3x mehr Leitungssysteme: 704 vs 24
- 4x bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 1,830 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
- Etwa 50% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1857 vs 1237
- Etwa 60% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 478 vs 299
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13318 vs 4657
- Etwa 51% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.582 vs 27.517
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 371.843 vs 354.254
- Etwa 75% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.156 vs 1.807
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.449 vs 20.323
- 8.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 248.838 vs 29.327
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2156 vs 1870
- Etwa 55% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2475 vs 1596
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 vs 3309
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2156 vs 1870
- Etwa 55% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2475 vs 1596
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 vs 3309
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 13 February 2018 vs 1 September 2017 |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1300 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 57.2 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 704 vs 24 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,830 gflops vs 460.8 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1857 vs 1237 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 478 vs 299 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13318 vs 4657 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.582 vs 27.517 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 371.843 vs 354.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.156 vs 1.807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.449 vs 20.323 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 248.838 vs 29.327 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2156 vs 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2475 vs 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 vs 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2156 vs 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2475 vs 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 vs 3309 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Etwa 17% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:350 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2.3x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
Kerntaktfrequenz | 350 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 11
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega 11 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1857 | 1237 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 478 | 299 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13318 | 4657 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.582 | 27.517 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 371.843 | 354.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.156 | 1.807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.449 | 20.323 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 248.838 | 29.327 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2156 | 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2475 | 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2156 | 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2475 | 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3309 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 68 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon Vega 11 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | GCN 5.0 | Generation 9.5 |
Codename | Owl | Coffee Lake GT2 |
Startdatum | 13 February 2018 | 1 September 2017 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 886 | 1234 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1300 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 300 MHz | 350 MHz |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,830 gflops | 460.8 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 704 | 24 |
Texturfüllrate | 57.2 GTexel / s | 28.8 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 4,940 million | 189 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | |
Speicher |
||
Speichertyp | System Shared | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 1 | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Technologien |
||
Quick Sync |