AMD Radeon Vega 11 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 11 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 11

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 10% higher pipelines: 704 vs 640
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 485 vs 292
• Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.449 vs 30.523
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 248.838 vs 223.683

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)

• 4.5x more core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1300 MHz
• Around 4% higher texture fill rate: 59.72 GTexel / s vs 57.2 GTexel / s
• Around 4% better floating-point performance: 1,911 gflops vs 1,830 gflops
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4462 vs 1838
• Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17485 vs 13288
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.209 vs 41.582
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 799.414 vs 371.843
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.536 vs 3.156
• 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7239 vs 2156
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3721 vs 2475
• 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7239 vs 2156
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3721 vs 2475

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 11
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1838 4462
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	485 292
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	13288 17485
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	41.582 67.209
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	371.843 799.414
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.156 4.536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	52.449 30.523
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	248.838 223.683
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2156 7239
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2475 3721
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3343 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2156 7239
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2475 3721
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3343 3359

Compare specifications (specs)