AMD Radeon Vega 11 vs NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 11 and NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 11

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 57.2 GTexel / s vs 43.72 GTexel / s
• Around 10% higher pipelines: 704 vs 640
• Around 31% better floating-point performance: 1,830 gflops vs 1,399 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 45 Watt
• Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 478 vs 312
• Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13318 vs 10582
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.449 vs 48.966
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 248.838 vs 163.204

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

• 3.6x more core clock speed: 1093 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3217 vs 1857
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 52.821 vs 41.582
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 793.297 vs 371.843
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.631 vs 3.156
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4941 vs 2156
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2645 vs 2475
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4941 vs 2156
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2645 vs 2475

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 11
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1857 3217
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	478 312
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	13318 10582
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	41.582 52.821
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	371.843 793.297
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.156 3.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	52.449 48.966
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	248.838 163.204
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2156 4941
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2475 2645
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3343 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2156 4941
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2475 2645
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3343 3359

Compare specifications (specs)