AMD Radeon Vega 3 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 M360
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 3 Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 M360 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 3 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1011 MHz vs 925 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1850 vs 1623
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1850 vs 1623
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 February 2018 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1011 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1850 vs 1623 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1850 vs 1623 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M360
- 3x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1809 vs 1034
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 395 vs 314
- Around 83% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8176 vs 4468
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3180
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3180
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1809 vs 1034 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 395 vs 314 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8176 vs 4468 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3180 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3180 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 3 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M360
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Vega 3 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1034 | 1809 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 | 395 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4468 | 8176 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 404 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1850 | 1623 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1850 | 1623 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3180 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3180 | 3360 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.479 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 575.773 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.902 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.15 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 87.811 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2801 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2801 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Vega 3 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 M360 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Raven | Tropo |
| Launch date | 1 February 2018 | 5 May 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1014 | 1016 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1011 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 4,940 million | 1,500 million |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 512 | |
| Texture fill rate | 29.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Vega 3 Mobile with others
AMDRadeon Vega 3 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 Ti 4400
AMDRadeon Vega 3 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5200 LE
AMDRadeon Vega 3 Mobile vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5450
AMDRadeon Vega 3 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 M360
AMDRadeon Vega 3 Mobile vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580
AMDRadeon Vega 3 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX230
