AMD Radeon Vega 3 vs AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 3 and AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 3
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1412 vs 1106
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2111 vs 1841
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1412 vs 1106
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2111 vs 1841
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 February 2018 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1412 vs 1106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2111 vs 1841 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1412 vs 1106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2111 vs 1841 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
- 3x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 806.4 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5150 vs 3963
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3260 vs 3174
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3260 vs 3174
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 192 |
| Floating-point performance | 806.4 gflops vs 384.0 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5150 vs 3963 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3260 vs 3174 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3260 vs 3174 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 3
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 889 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3963 | 5150 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.049 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 183.156 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.75 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.933 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.006 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1412 | 1106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2111 | 1841 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3174 | 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1412 | 1106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2111 | 1841 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3174 | 3260 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 418 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Vega 3 | AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Owl | Oland |
| Launch date | 13 February 2018 | 5 May 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1267 | 1281 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops | 806.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s | 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4,940 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Vega 3 with others
AMDRadeon Vega 3 vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder Radeon 8500DV
AMDRadeon Vega 3 vs
ATIRadeon 9200 SE
AMDRadeon Vega 3 vs
ATIRadeon 9200 LE
AMDRadeon Vega 3 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740
AMDRadeon Vega 3 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M260DX
AMDRadeon Vega 3 vs
AMDRadeon R8 M365DX
