AMD Radeon Vega 3 vs Intel UHD Graphics 600

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 3 and Intel UHD Graphics 600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 3

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
  • Around 50% higher core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 200 MHz
  • Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 750 MHz
  • 16x more pipelines: 192 vs 12
  • 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 889 vs 318
  • 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 303 vs 92
  • 3.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3963 vs 1004
  • Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.049 vs 5.952
  • 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 183.156 vs 56.77
  • Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.75 vs 0.427
  • 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.933 vs 5.876
  • 8.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 60.006 vs 6.882
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1412 vs 476
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2111 vs 1000
  • Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3174 vs 1701
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1412 vs 476
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2111 vs 1000
  • Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3174 vs 1701
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 February 2018 vs 11 December 2017
Core clock speed 300 MHz vs 200 MHz
Boost clock speed 1000 MHz vs 750 MHz
Pipelines 192 vs 12
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 889 vs 318
PassMark - G2D Mark 303 vs 92
Geekbench - OpenCL 3963 vs 1004
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 10.049 vs 5.952
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 183.156 vs 56.77
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.75 vs 0.427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 18.933 vs 5.876
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 60.006 vs 6.882
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1412 vs 476
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2111 vs 1000
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3174 vs 1701
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1412 vs 476
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2111 vs 1000
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3174 vs 1701

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 600

  • 3x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 15 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 5 Watt vs 15 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 3
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 600

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
889
318
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
303
92
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
3963
1004
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10.049
5.952
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
183.156
56.77
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
0.75
0.427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
18.933
5.876
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
60.006
6.882
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1412
476
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2111
1000
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3174
1701
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1412
476
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2111
1000
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3174
1701
Name AMD Radeon Vega 3 Intel UHD Graphics 600
PassMark - G3D Mark 889 318
PassMark - G2D Mark 303 92
Geekbench - OpenCL 3963 1004
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 10.049 5.952
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 183.156 56.77
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.75 0.427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 18.933 5.876
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 60.006 6.882
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1412 476
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2111 1000
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3174 1701
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1412 476
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2111 1000
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3174 1701
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 418 0

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Vega 3 Intel UHD Graphics 600

Essentials

Architecture GCN 5.0 Generation 9.5
Code name Owl Gemini Lake GT1
Launch date 13 February 2018 11 December 2017
Place in performance rating 1267 1624
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1000 MHz 750 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 200 MHz
Floating-point performance 384.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 192 12
Texture fill rate 12 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 5 Watt
Transistor count 4,940 million 189 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors None

Memory

Memory type System Shared DDR4 / LPDDR4
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit
Shared memory 1

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.5

Technologies

Quick Sync