AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient vs AMD FirePro W4100

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient and AMD FirePro W4100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 50 Watt
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1894 vs 1514
• Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.039 vs 15.65
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.666 vs 1.631
• Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 135.437 vs 75.309
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2408 vs 1951
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 1620
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2408 vs 1951
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 1620

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4100

• 2.1x more core clock speed: 630 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 455 vs 355
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 538.848 vs 176.928
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.533 vs 27.603
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3399 vs 3170
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3399 vs 3170

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W4100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1894 1514
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	355 455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26.039 15.65
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	176.928 538.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.666 1.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.603 31.533
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	135.437 75.309
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2408 1951
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3170 3399
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 1620
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2408 1951
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3170 3399
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 1620

Compare specifications (specs)