AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient versus AMD FirePro W4100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient and AMD FirePro W4100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 43% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 50 Watt
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1894 versus 1514
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.039 versus 15.65
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.666 versus 1.631
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 135.437 versus 75.309
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2408 versus 1951
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 versus 1620
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2408 versus 1951
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 versus 1620
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 23 April 2018 versus 13 August 2014 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 50 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1894 versus 1514 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.039 versus 15.65 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.666 versus 1.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 135.437 versus 75.309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2408 versus 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 versus 1620 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2408 versus 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 versus 1620 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W4100
- 2.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 630 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 455 versus 355
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 538.848 versus 176.928
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.533 versus 27.603
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3399 versus 3170
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3399 versus 3170
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 630 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 455 versus 355 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 538.848 versus 176.928 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.533 versus 27.603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3399 versus 3170 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3399 versus 3170 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W4100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | AMD FirePro W4100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1894 | 1514 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 | 455 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.039 | 15.65 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 176.928 | 538.848 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.666 | 1.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.603 | 31.533 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 135.437 | 75.309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2408 | 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 | 3399 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 1620 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2408 | 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 | 3399 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 1620 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 862 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5489 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | AMD FirePro W4100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | Raven | Cape Verde |
Date de sortie | 23 April 2018 | 13 August 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 972 | 974 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 630 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 50 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | 1,500 million |
Performance á point flottant | 645.1 gflops | |
Pipelines | 512 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 20.16 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Facteur de forme | Low Profile / Half Length | |
Longeur | 171 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
Powerplay |