AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient and ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 16.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1894 vs 114
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 355 vs 346
- 7.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 426
- 7.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 426
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 April 2018 vs 28 June 2007 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1894 vs 114 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 vs 346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 426 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
- Around 75% higher core clock speed: 525 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 75% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 35 Watt
Core clock speed | 525 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1894 | 114 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 | 346 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.039 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 176.928 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.666 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.603 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 135.437 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2408 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2408 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 426 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 862 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Raven | RV610 |
Launch date | 23 April 2018 | 28 June 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 957 | 954 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 525 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | 180 million |
Floating-point performance | 42 gflops | |
Pipelines | 40 | |
Texture fill rate | 2.1 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR2 |