AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 411 vs 307
- Around 36% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8770 vs 6448
- Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.891 vs 15.053
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.104 vs 1.72
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.17 vs 35.916
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 132.07 vs 52.899
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6729 vs 3346
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6729 vs 3346
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 vs 22 March 2012 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 411 vs 307 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8770 vs 6448 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.891 vs 15.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.104 vs 1.72 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.17 vs 35.916 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 132.07 vs 52.899 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6729 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6729 vs 3346 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
- Around 99% higher core clock speed: 598 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1757 vs 1582
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 588.645 vs 365.4
- Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2731 vs 1514
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3627 vs 2433
- Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2731 vs 1514
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3627 vs 2433
- 2.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2062 vs 705
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 598 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1757 vs 1582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 588.645 vs 365.4 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2731 vs 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3627 vs 2433 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2731 vs 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3627 vs 2433 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2062 vs 705 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1582 | 1757 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 411 | 307 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8770 | 6448 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.891 | 15.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 365.4 | 588.645 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.104 | 1.72 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.17 | 35.916 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 132.07 | 52.899 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1514 | 2731 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2433 | 3627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6729 | 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1514 | 2731 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2433 | 3627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6729 | 3346 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 705 | 2062 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Owl | GF114 |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 | 22 March 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 965 | 968 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 598 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | 1,950 million |
CUDA cores | 336 | |
Floating-point performance | 803.7 gflops | |
Pipelines | 336 | |
Texture fill rate | 33.5 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1526 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 72.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 192bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
SLI |