AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
- Videocard is newer: launch date 14 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 130 nm
- 22.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1583 vs 69
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 411 vs 178
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 vs 22 July 2003 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 130 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1583 vs 69 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 411 vs 178 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed | 400 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1583 | 69 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 411 | 178 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8776 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.891 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 365.4 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.104 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.17 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 132.07 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1514 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2433 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6729 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1514 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2433 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6729 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 705 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Rankine |
Code name | Owl | NV35 |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 | 22 July 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 965 | 962 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $203 | |
Price now | $166.60 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 0.53 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 400 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 130 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | 135 million |
Texture fill rate | 3.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x Molex |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 9.0a |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 1.5 (2.1) |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 27.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 850 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR |