AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 6.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 100 Watt
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 410 versus 314
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8776 versus 6362
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.891 versus 22.12
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.104 versus 2.003
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.17 versus 33.983
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 132.07 versus 59.007
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6729 versus 3347
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6729 versus 3347
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 versus 22 March 2012 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 100 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 410 versus 314 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8776 versus 6362 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.891 versus 22.12 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.104 versus 2.003 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.17 versus 33.983 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 132.07 versus 59.007 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6729 versus 3347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6729 versus 3347 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M
- 2.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 620 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1928 versus 1581
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 664.78 versus 365.4
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2649 versus 1514
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 versus 2433
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2649 versus 1514
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 versus 2433
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 620 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1928 versus 1581 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 664.78 versus 365.4 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2649 versus 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 versus 2433 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2649 versus 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 versus 2433 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1581 | 1928 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 410 | 314 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8776 | 6362 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.891 | 22.12 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 365.4 | 664.78 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.104 | 2.003 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.17 | 33.983 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 132.07 | 59.007 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1514 | 2649 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2433 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6729 | 3347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1514 | 2649 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2433 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6729 | 3347 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 705 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | Owl | GF114 |
Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 | 22 March 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 950 | 953 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 620 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 100 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | 1,950 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 384 | |
Performance á point flottant | 952.3 gflops | |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 39.7 billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | MXM-B (3.0) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Options SLI | 2-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 96.0 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
FXAA | ||
SLI |