AMD Radeon Vega 9 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 9 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 9
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher pipelines: 576 vs 448
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 14.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 215 Watt
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 26 Oct 2017 vs 26 March 2010 |
| Pipelines | 576 vs 448 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 215 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 408 vs 406 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
- Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3107 vs 1596
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10961 vs 9693
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3873 vs 2591
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3873 vs 2591
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3614 vs 1856
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3614 vs 1856
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3317 vs 2482
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3317 vs 2482
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3107 vs 1596 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10961 vs 9693 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3873 vs 2591 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3873 vs 2591 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3614 vs 1856 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3614 vs 1856 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3317 vs 2482 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3317 vs 2482 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 9
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Vega 9 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 408 | 406 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1596 | 3107 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9693 | 10961 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2591 | 3873 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2591 | 3873 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1856 | 3614 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1856 | 3614 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2482 | 3317 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2482 | 3317 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.93 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 980.005 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.268 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 47.309 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.852 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Vega 9 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Vega | Fermi |
| Code name | Vega Raven Ridge | GF100 |
| Launch date | 26 Oct 2017 | 26 March 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 812 | 810 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
| Price now | $522.01 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 6.87 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 576 | 448 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 215 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4500 million | 3,100 million |
| Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 448 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,088.6 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Texture fill rate | 34.0 billion / sec | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | |
Memory |
||
| Shared memory | Yes | 0 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1280 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 133.9 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 320 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1674 MHz (3348 data rate) | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVIMini HDMI | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Length | 9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pins | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Vega 9 with others
AMDRadeon Vega 9 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 470
AMDRadeon Vega 9 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7450M
AMDRadeon Vega 9 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2200
AMDRadeon Vega 9 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 810A
AMDRadeon Vega 9 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645
AMDRadeon Vega 9 vs
NVIDIAT600
