AMD Radeon Vega 9 vs NVIDIA Quadro K510M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 9 and NVIDIA Quadro K510M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 9

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • 3x more pipelines: 576 vs 192
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
  • 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1590 vs 641
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2591 vs 1087
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2591 vs 1087
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 26 Oct 2017 vs 23 July 2013
Pipelines 576 vs 192
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1590 vs 641
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2591 vs 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2591 vs 1087

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K510M

  • Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 441 vs 405
  • Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2012 vs 1856
  • Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2012 vs 1856
  • Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3071 vs 2482
  • Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3071 vs 2482
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 441 vs 405
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2012 vs 1856
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2012 vs 1856
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3071 vs 2482
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3071 vs 2482

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 9
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K510M

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
405
441
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1590
641
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2591
1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2591
1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1856
2012
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1856
2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2482
3071
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2482
3071
Name AMD Radeon Vega 9 NVIDIA Quadro K510M
PassMark - G2D Mark 405 441
PassMark - G3D Mark 1590 641
Geekbench - OpenCL 9547
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2591 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2591 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1856 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1856 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2482 3071
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2482 3071

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Vega 9 NVIDIA Quadro K510M

Essentials

Architecture Vega Kepler 2.0
Code name Vega Raven Ridge GK208
Launch date 26 Oct 2017 23 July 2013
Place in performance rating 815 818
Type Laptop Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 576 192
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 30 Watt
Transistor count 4500 million 1270 Million
Core clock speed 846 MHz
Floating-point performance 324.9 gflops
Texture fill rate 13.54 GTexel / s

API support

DirectX 12.1 12
OpenGL 4.5
Shader Model 5
Vulkan

Memory

Shared memory Yes 0
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 19.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 2400 MHz
Memory type GDDR5

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs
Display Port 1.2

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size medium sized

Technologies

3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus