AMD Radeon Vega 9 vs NVIDIA Quadro K510M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 9 and NVIDIA Quadro K510M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 9
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 3x more pipelines: 576 vs 192
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1590 vs 641
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2591 vs 1087
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2591 vs 1087
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 Oct 2017 vs 23 July 2013 |
Pipelines | 576 vs 192 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1590 vs 641 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2591 vs 1087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2591 vs 1087 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K510M
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 441 vs 405
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2012 vs 1856
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2012 vs 1856
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3071 vs 2482
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3071 vs 2482
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 441 vs 405 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2012 vs 1856 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2012 vs 1856 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3071 vs 2482 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3071 vs 2482 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 9
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K510M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega 9 | NVIDIA Quadro K510M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 405 | 441 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1590 | 641 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9547 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2591 | 1087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2591 | 1087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1856 | 2012 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1856 | 2012 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2482 | 3071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2482 | 3071 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Vega 9 | NVIDIA Quadro K510M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Vega | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | Vega Raven Ridge | GK208 |
Launch date | 26 Oct 2017 | 23 July 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 815 | 818 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 576 | 192 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 4500 million | 1270 Million |
Core clock speed | 846 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 324.9 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 13.54 GTexel / s | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Shared memory | Yes | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 19.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |