AMD Radeon Vega 9 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 9 and NVIDIA Quadro K2200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 9
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1124 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 68 Watt
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1856 vs 1577
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1856 vs 1577
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2482 vs 1671
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2482 vs 1671
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 Oct 2017 vs 22 July 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1124 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 68 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1856 vs 1577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1856 vs 1577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2482 vs 1671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2482 vs 1671 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 640 vs 576
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 542 vs 405
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3551 vs 1590
- Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12020 vs 9651
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4921 vs 2591
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4921 vs 2591
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 640 vs 576 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 542 vs 405 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3551 vs 1590 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12020 vs 9651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4921 vs 2591 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4921 vs 2591 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 9
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2200
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega 9 | NVIDIA Quadro K2200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 405 | 542 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1590 | 3551 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9651 | 12020 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2591 | 4921 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2591 | 4921 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1856 | 1577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1856 | 1577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2482 | 1671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2482 | 1671 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.695 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 588.094 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.205 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.455 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 165.39 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1193 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Vega 9 | NVIDIA Quadro K2200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Vega | Maxwell |
Code name | Vega Raven Ridge | GM107 |
Launch date | 26 Oct 2017 | 22 July 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 812 | 815 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $395.75 | |
Price now | $343.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.01 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1124 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 576 | 640 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 68 Watt |
Transistor count | 4500 million | 1,870 million |
Core clock speed | 1046 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 1,439 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 44.96 GTexel / s | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Shared memory | Yes | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 202 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None |