AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition and AMD Radeon Pro Duo videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 60% higher boost clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 300 Watt vs 350 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
• 3.8x more memory clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 500 MHz
• Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13013 vs 8183
• Around 36% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 75767 vs 55512
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 190.25 vs 141.474
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.789 vs 13.132
• Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 181.113 vs 112.973
• Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1373.944 vs 799.933
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12980 vs 10141
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12980 vs 10141

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Duo

• 5.5x more texture fill rate: 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 409.6 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 2x 4096 vs 4096
• Around 25% better floating-point performance: 2x 8,192 gflops vs 13,107 gflops
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 780 vs 742
• 11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 vs 3356
• 11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 vs 3356

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	13013 8183
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	742 780
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	75767 55512
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	190.25 141.474
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3611.018 3621.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17.789 13.132
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	181.113 112.973
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1373.944 799.933
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12980 10141
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 38251
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12980 10141
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 38251

Compare specifications (specs)