AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition versus AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition and AMD Radeon Pro Duo pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 60% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1600 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 17% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 300 Watt versus 350 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- 3.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1890 MHz versus 500 MHz
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 13327 versus 8137
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 750 versus 745
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 75705 versus 53806
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 190.25 versus 141.474
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.789 versus 13.132
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 181.113 versus 112.973
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1373.944 versus 799.933
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12980 versus 10141
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12980 versus 10141
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 June 2017 versus 26 April 2016 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1600 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt versus 350 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1890 MHz versus 500 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13327 versus 8137 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 versus 745 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 75705 versus 53806 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 190.25 versus 141.474 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.789 versus 13.132 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 181.113 versus 112.973 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1373.944 versus 799.933 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12980 versus 10141 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12980 versus 10141 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3713 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro Duo
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 409.6 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 2x 4096 versus 4096
- Environ 25% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2x 8,192 gflops versus 13,107 gflops
- 11.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 versus 3356
- 11.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 versus 3356
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 409.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 4096 versus 4096 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2x 8,192 gflops versus 13,107 gflops |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3621.344 versus 3611.018 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 versus 3356 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | AMD Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13327 | 8137 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 | 745 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 75705 | 53806 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 190.25 | 141.474 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3611.018 | 3621.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.789 | 13.132 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 181.113 | 112.973 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1373.944 | 799.933 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12980 | 10141 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 38251 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12980 | 10141 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 38251 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7074 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | AMD Radeon Pro Duo | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Nom de code | Vega 10 | Capsaicin |
| Date de sortie | 27 June 2017 | 26 April 2016 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $999 | $1,499 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 199 | 188 |
| Prix maintenant | $999.99 | $849 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.37 | 17.05 |
| Conception | reference | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1600 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1382 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 13,107 gflops | 2x 8,192 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 4096 | 2x 4096 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 409.6 GTexel / s | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 12,500 million | 8,900 million |
| Unités de Compute | 128 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | 277 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 3x 8-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | DirectX® 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 483.8 GB / s | 512 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 2048 Bit | 2x 4096 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1890 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
Technologies |
||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| Enduro | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition avec des autres
AMDRadeon Vega Frontier Edition vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4500 X2
AMDRadeon Vega Frontier Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
AMDRadeon Vega Frontier Edition vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 9100
AMDRadeon Vega Frontier Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti
AMDRadeon Vega Frontier Edition vs
AppleA14 Bionic
AMDRadeon Vega Frontier Edition vs
AMDRadeon 780M
