NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 724.1x more texture fill rate: 296.6 GTexel/s vs 409.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14832 vs 13013
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19565 vs 12980
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19565 vs 12980
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 27 June 2017 |
| Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s vs 409.6 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 300 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14832 vs 13013 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 vs 12980 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 vs 12980 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1382 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3072
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 742 vs 705
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1382 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 3072 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 742 vs 705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3714 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 | 742 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14832 | 13013 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 | 12980 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 | 12980 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3718 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 7074 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 75767 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 190.25 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3611.018 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.789 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 181.113 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1373.944 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Code name | TU104 | Vega 10 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 27 June 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 189 | 193 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Price now | $999.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 14.37 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 1382 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 296.6 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.492 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 4096 |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s | 409.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 12,500 million |
| Floating-point performance | 13,107 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Width | IGP | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 483.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 2048 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 295X2
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 580X
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX A1000 Mobile
