AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition and AMD Radeon R9 295X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 57% higher boost clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1018 MHz
- Around 14% better floating-point performance: 13,107 gflops vs 2x 5,733 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 300 Watt vs 500 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 51% higher memory clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13013 vs 8599
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 June 2017 vs 29 April 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1018 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 13,107 gflops vs 2x 5,733 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt vs 500 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13013 vs 8599 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- 5.3x more texture fill rate: 2x 179.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 409.6 GTexel / s
- Around 38% higher pipelines: 2x 2816 vs 4096
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 756 vs 742
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 179.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 409.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 2816 vs 4096 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 756 vs 742 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 295X2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13013 | 8599 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 742 | 756 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 75767 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 190.25 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3611.018 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.789 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 181.113 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1373.944 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12980 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12980 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7074 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Vega 10 | Vesuvius |
Launch date | 27 June 2017 | 29 April 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $1,499 |
Place in performance rating | 193 | 190 |
Price now | $999.99 | $1,099.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.37 | 11.14 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1018 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1382 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 13,107 gflops | 2x 5,733 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 4096 | 2x 2816 |
Texture fill rate | 409.6 GTexel / s | 2x 179.2 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 500 Watt |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | 6,200 million |
Stream Processors | 5632 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 307 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 2 x 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB / s | 640 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 2x 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |