AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
• Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1582 MHz
• Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 409.6 GTexel / s vs 354.4 GTexel / s
• Around 14% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3584
• Around 16% better floating-point performance: 13,107 gflops vs 11,340 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 45% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 11 GB
• Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 75923 vs 67474
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3611.018 vs 2406.499
• 7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 181.113 vs 25.833
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1373.944 vs 1002.573

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)

• Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1481 MHz vs 1382 MHz
• Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 300 Watt
• 5.8x more memory clock speed: 11008 MHz vs 1890 MHz
• Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18567 vs 13226
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 934 vs 748
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 205.837 vs 190.25
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.591 vs 17.789
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15019 vs 12980
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15019 vs 12980
• Around 40% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9874 vs 7074

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	13226 18567
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	748 934
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	75923 67474
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	190.25 205.837
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3611.018 2406.499
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17.789 19.591
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	181.113 25.833
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1373.944 1002.573
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12980 15019
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12980 15019
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	7074 9874

Compare specifications (specs)