NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 543.2x more texture fill rate: 222.5 GTexel/s vs 409.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 85798 vs 76041
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 232.933 vs 190.25
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3728.135 vs 3611.018
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.872 vs 17.789
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 vs 12980
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 vs 12980
- Around 11% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7856 vs 7074
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 November 2018 vs 27 June 2017 |
| Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s vs 409.6 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 300 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85798 vs 76041 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 vs 190.25 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 vs 3611.018 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 vs 17.789 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 vs 12980 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 vs 12980 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7856 vs 7074 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
- Around 38% higher core clock speed: 1382 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Around 78% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2304
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 16% higher memory clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
- Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 181.113 vs 136.223
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1373.944 vs 1011.233
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1382 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 2304 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 181.113 vs 136.223 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1373.944 vs 1011.233 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3714 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85798 | 76041 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 | 190.25 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 | 3611.018 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 | 17.789 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 | 181.113 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 | 1373.944 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 | 12980 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 | 12980 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7856 | 7074 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13040 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 737 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Code name | TU104 | Vega 10 |
| GCN generation | Quadro RTX | |
| Launch date | 13 November 2018 | 27 June 2017 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | $999 |
| Place in performance rating | 207 | 210 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price now | $999.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 14.37 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1005 MHz | 1382 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.24 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.119 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 4096 |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s | 409.6 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 12,500 million |
| Floating-point performance | 13,107 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | 267 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 416.0 GB/s | 483.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 2048 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) | 1890 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon Vega Frontier Edition
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 9100
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon 780M
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6550M
