AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 1% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1600 MHz versus 1582 MHz
- Environ 16% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 409.6 GTexel / s versus 354.4 GTexel / s
- Environ 14% de pipelines plus haut: 4096 versus 3584
- Environ 16% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 13,107 gflops versus 11,340 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 45% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 16 GB versus 11 GB
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 75923 versus 67474
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3611.018 versus 2406.499
- 7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 181.113 versus 25.833
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1373.944 versus 1002.573
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 27 June 2017 versus 10 March 2017 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1600 MHz versus 1582 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 409.6 GTexel / s versus 354.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4096 versus 3584 |
Performance á point flottant | 13,107 gflops versus 11,340 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 16 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 11 GB |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 75923 versus 67474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3611.018 versus 2406.499 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 181.113 versus 25.833 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1373.944 versus 1002.573 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3716 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1481 MHz versus 1382 MHz
- Environ 20% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 300 Watt
- 5.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 11008 MHz versus 1890 MHz
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18567 versus 13226
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 934 versus 748
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 205.837 versus 190.25
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.591 versus 17.789
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15019 versus 12980
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15019 versus 12980
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9874 versus 7074
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1481 MHz versus 1382 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 300 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 11008 MHz versus 1890 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18567 versus 13226 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 934 versus 748 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.837 versus 190.25 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.591 versus 17.789 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15019 versus 12980 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15019 versus 12980 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9874 versus 7074 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13226 | 18567 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 748 | 934 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 75923 | 67474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 190.25 | 205.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3611.018 | 2406.499 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.789 | 19.591 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 181.113 | 25.833 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1373.944 | 1002.573 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12980 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12980 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7074 | 9874 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
Nom de code | Vega 10 | GP102 |
Date de sortie | 27 June 2017 | 10 March 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $999 | $699 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 210 | 207 |
Prix maintenant | $999.99 | $826.98 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.37 | 27.48 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1600 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1382 MHz | 1481 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 13,107 gflops | 11,340 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 4096 | 3584 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 409.6 GTexel / s | 354.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 12,500 million | 11,800 million |
Température maximale du GPU | 91 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 16 GB | 11 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 483.8 GB / s | 484.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 2048 Bit | 352 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1890 MHz | 11008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | GDDR5X |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |