AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 vs AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 and AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100

• Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 300 Watt
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 769 vs 750
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3924.968 vs 3611.018
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13848 vs 12980
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13848 vs 12980

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

• Around 15% higher core clock speed: 1382 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1500 MHz
• Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 409.6 GTexel / s vs 384.0 GTexel / s
• Around 7% better floating-point performance: 13,107 gflops vs 12,288 gflops
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13327 vs 12844
• Around 17% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 75705 vs 64683
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 190.25 vs 174.714
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.789 vs 17.305
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 181.113 vs 175.219
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1373.944 vs 1226.861
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3680
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3336
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3680
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3336

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	12844 13327
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	769 750
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	64683 75705
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	174.714 190.25
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3924.968 3611.018
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17.305 17.789
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	175.219 181.113
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1226.861 1373.944
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13848 12980
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3680 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13848 12980
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3680 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3356

Compare specifications (specs)