ATI FirePro V9800 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285
Comparative analysis of ATI FirePro V9800 and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V9800
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 275 MHz
- 61.8x more texture fill rate: 68.0 GTexel / s vs 1.1 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 110 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 128 MB
- 9.2x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 64.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2727 vs 42
- 5.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 655 vs 127
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 9 September 2010 vs 6 June 2006 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 275 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 68.0 GTexel / s vs 1.1 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 110 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2727 vs 42 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 655 vs 127 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285
- 13.9x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 250 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI FirePro V9800
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | ATI FirePro V9800 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2727 | 42 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 655 | 127 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.718 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 738.1 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.867 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.153 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 118.756 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI FirePro V9800 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Curie |
Code name | Cypress | NV44 A2 |
Launch date | 9 September 2010 | 6 June 2006 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,499 | $27.99 |
Place in performance rating | 627 | 1227 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Price now | $61.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 0.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 275 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,720.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 110 nm |
Pipelines | 1600 | |
Texture fill rate | 68.0 GTexel / s | 1.1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 18 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 75 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | 1x DMS-59 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB / s | 8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |