ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 vs ATI Radeon X1700 FSC
Comparative analysis of ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 and ATI Radeon X1700 FSC videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 675 MHz vs 587 MHz
- 9.2x more texture fill rate: 21.6 GTexel / s vs 2.348 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 26% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 44 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- Around 15% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1390 MHz
Launch date | 9 January 2009 vs 5 November 2007 |
Core clock speed | 675 MHz vs 587 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s vs 2.348 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 44 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1390 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1700 FSC
Name | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | ATI Radeon X1700 FSC |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 463 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 375 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2907 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2907 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | ATI Radeon X1700 FSC | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale | R500 |
Code name | M96 | RV535 |
Launch date | 9 January 2009 | 5 November 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 709 | not rated |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 675 MHz | 587 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 432.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | |
Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s | 2.348 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 44 Watt |
Transistor count | 514 million | 330 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 22.24 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1390 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI | ||
1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer) | ||
DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600 | ||
HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio) | ||
PCI-E 2.0 x16 | ||
Powerplay |