ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
Comparative analysis of ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 and NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570
- 11.8x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 235 Watt
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 245 vs 172
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1684 vs 1032
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1684 vs 1032
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 235 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 245 vs 172 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1684 vs 1032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1684 vs 1032 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 732 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 14.9x more texture fill rate: 164.0 GTexel / s vs 11 GTexel / s
- 6.7x more pipelines: 2688 vs 400
- 8.9x better floating-point performance: 3,935 gflops vs 440.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 5.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2918 vs 528
- 13.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16023 vs 1185
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7038 vs 3070
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7038 vs 3070
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 732 MHz vs 550 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 164.0 GTexel / s vs 11 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2688 vs 400 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,935 gflops vs 440.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2918 vs 528 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16023 vs 1185 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7038 vs 3070 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7038 vs 3070 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 | NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 528 | 2918 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 245 | 172 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1185 | 16023 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1684 | 1032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1684 | 1032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3070 | 7038 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3070 | 7038 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.455 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1666.354 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.836 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 92.472 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 275.229 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 | NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
| Code name | Pinewood | GK110 |
| Launch date | 23 November 2012 | 12 November 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1076 | 791 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $7,699 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 732 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 440.0 gflops | 3,935 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 400 | 2688 |
| Texture fill rate | 11 GTexel / s | 164.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 235 Watt |
| Transistor count | 627 million | 7,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 249.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 with others
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5570 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 545
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5570 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7450A
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5570 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5470
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5570 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4100M
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5570 vs
IntelIris Graphics 6100
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5570 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M500M
