NVIDIA Quadro M500M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M500M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 87% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 550 MHz
- Around 63% higher texture fill rate: 17.98 GTexel / s vs 11 GTexel / s
- Around 96% better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 440.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1170 vs 528
- 5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5935 vs 1185
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1729 vs 1684
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1729 vs 1684
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3122 vs 3070
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3122 vs 3070
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 April 2016 vs 23 November 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s vs 11 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops vs 440.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1170 vs 528 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5935 vs 1185 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1729 vs 1684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1729 vs 1684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3122 vs 3070 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3122 vs 3070 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570
- Around 4% higher pipelines: 400 vs 384
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 30 Watt
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 245 vs 188
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 400 vs 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 245 vs 188 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M500M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M500M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1170 | 528 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 188 | 245 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5935 | 1185 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2174 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2174 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1729 | 1684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1729 | 1684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3122 | 3070 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3122 | 3070 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M500M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GM108 | Pinewood |
Launch date | 27 April 2016 | 23 November 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1073 | 1076 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 550 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 440.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 400 |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 11 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 627 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |