ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G
Comparative analysis of ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 and NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 75% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 8.8x more texture fill rate: 28 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
- 100x more pipelines: 800 vs 8
- 87.5x better floating-point performance: 1,120.0 gflops vs 12.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- 5x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 18.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1082 vs 59
- 5.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3077 vs 542
- 5.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3077 vs 542
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 vs 9 May 2007 |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 28 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 800 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 1,120.0 gflops vs 12.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 80 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1082 vs 59 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3077 vs 542 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3077 vs 542 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 241 vs 218
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 vs 218 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 | NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1082 | 59 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 218 | 241 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.17 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 585.971 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.86 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.108 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.606 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2070 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1679 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3077 | 542 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2070 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1679 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3077 | 542 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 | NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
Code name | Broadway | G86 |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 | 9 May 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1211 | 1213 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 400 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,120.0 gflops | 12.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 800 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 28 GTexel / s | 3.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 10 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR3 / GDDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
HDMI 1.3a | ||
HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
PCI-E 16x | ||
PowerMizer 7.0 |