NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1201 vs 1085
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 235 vs 219
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.947 vs 8.17
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.982 vs 0.86
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2283 vs 2070
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3299 vs 1679
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2283 vs 2070
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3299 vs 1679
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 March 2012 vs 7 January 2010 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1201 vs 1085 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 235 vs 219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.947 vs 8.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.982 vs 0.86 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2283 vs 2070 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3299 vs 1679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2283 vs 2070 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3299 vs 1679 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870
- 2.1x more pipelines: 800 vs 384
- Around 72% better floating-point performance: 1,120.0 gflops vs 652.8 gflops
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 585.971 vs 340.824
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.108 vs 18.773
- 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 98.606 vs 23.111
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3077 vs 1913
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3077 vs 1913
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 800 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,120.0 gflops vs 652.8 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 585.971 vs 340.824 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.108 vs 18.773 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.606 vs 23.111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3077 vs 1913 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3077 vs 1913 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1201 | 1085 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 235 | 219 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3799 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.947 | 8.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 340.824 | 585.971 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.982 | 0.86 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.773 | 20.108 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.111 | 98.606 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2283 | 2070 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3299 | 1679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1913 | 3077 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2283 | 2070 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3299 | 1679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1913 | 3077 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 414 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GK107 | Broadway |
Launch date | 22 March 2012 | 7 January 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1214 | 1216 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Floating-point performance | 652.8 gflops | 1,120.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 800 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,040 million |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | |
Texture fill rate | 28 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 128bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
HDMI 1.3a |