ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
Comparative analysis of ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- 3.3x more pipelines: 800 vs 240
- Around 66% better floating-point performance: 1,120.0 gflops vs 673.9 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 4.4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 219 Watt
- Around 14% higher maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 896 MB
- 3.5x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1134 MHz
- 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 219 vs 67
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 January 2010 vs 15 January 2009 |
| Pipelines | 800 vs 240 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,120.0 gflops vs 673.9 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 219 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 896 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1134 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 219 vs 67 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
- 2x more core clock speed: 1404 MHz vs 700 MHz
- Around 81% higher texture fill rate: 50.6 billion / sec vs 28 GTexel / s
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1385 vs 1084
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3195 vs 3077
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3195 vs 3077
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1404 MHz vs 700 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 50.6 billion / sec vs 28 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1385 vs 1084 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3195 vs 3077 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3195 vs 3077 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1084 | 1385 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 219 | 67 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.17 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 585.971 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.86 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.108 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.606 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2070 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1679 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3077 | 3195 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2070 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1679 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3077 | 3195 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 23256 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Broadway | GT200B |
| Launch date | 7 January 2010 | 15 January 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 1217 | 1232 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
| Price now | $119.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.43 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 1404 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,120.0 gflops | 673.9 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 800 | 240 |
| Texture fill rate | 28 GTexel / s | 50.6 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 219 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,400 million |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Two Dual Link DVI, 2x DVI |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 896 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | 127.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 448 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1134 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| HDMI 1.3a | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 with others
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5870 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5900 ZT
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5870 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7300 SE
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5870 vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 285
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5870 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4250 IGP
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5870 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 650M
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5870 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645M
