ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
Comparative analysis of ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 3.3x more pipelines: 800 vs 240
- Around 58% better floating-point performance: 1,120.0 gflops vs 708.5 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 4.1x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 204 Watt
- 3.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1242 MHz
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 224 vs 69
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 January 2010 vs 23 December 2008 |
| Pipelines | 800 vs 240 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,120.0 gflops vs 708.5 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 204 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1242 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 224 vs 69 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1476 MHz vs 700 MHz
- Around 85% higher texture fill rate: 51.8 billion / sec vs 28 GTexel / s
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1502 vs 1092
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3347 vs 3077
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3347 vs 3077
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1476 MHz vs 700 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 51.8 billion / sec vs 28 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1502 vs 1092 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 vs 3077 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 vs 3077 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1092 | 1502 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 224 | 69 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.17 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 585.971 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.86 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.108 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.606 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2070 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1679 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3077 | 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2070 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1679 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3077 | 3347 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 22124 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Broadway | GT200B |
| Launch date | 7 January 2010 | 23 December 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1200 | 1201 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $359 | |
| Price now | $179.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 9.17 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 1476 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,120.0 gflops | 708.5 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 800 | 240 |
| Texture fill rate | 28 GTexel / s | 51.8 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 204 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,400 million |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVTwo Dual Link DVI |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | 159.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1242 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| HDMI 1.3a | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 with others
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5870 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3410
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5870 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 5800
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5870 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 285
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5870 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5870 vs
IntelIris Graphics 5100
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5870 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8670D
