ATI Radeon HD 5570 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 5570 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 4.2x more pipelines: 400 vs 96
- 2x better floating-point performance: 520.0 gflops vs 257.28 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 39 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 480 vs 398
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 193 vs 87
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 2505
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 2505
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 October 2011 vs 2 February 2010 |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Pipelines | 400 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 520.0 gflops vs 257.28 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 39 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 480 vs 398 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 193 vs 87 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 2505 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 2505 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM
- Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 17.6 GTexel / s vs 13 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s vs 13 GTexel / s |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 5570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | ATI Radeon HD 5570 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 480 | 398 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 193 | 87 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1378 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.393 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 235.572 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.454 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.345 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.016 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1160 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1883 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 2505 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1160 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1883 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 2505 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Radeon HD 5570 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
Code name | Turks | G92 |
Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Launch date | 11 October 2011 | 2 February 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1367 | 1384 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 520.0 gflops | 257.28 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 400 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 13 GTexel / s | 17.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 39 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 716 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 165 mm | 175 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 32.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity |