ATI Radeon HD 5570 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 5570 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 2.1x more pipelines: 400 vs 192
- Around 12% better floating-point performance: 520.0 gflops vs 462.3 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 39 Watt vs 108 Watt
- 4.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 198 vs 47
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3258
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3258
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 11 October 2011 vs 30 March 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Pipelines | 400 vs 192 |
| Floating-point performance | 520.0 gflops vs 462.3 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 39 Watt vs 108 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 198 vs 47 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3258 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3258 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
- 3x more texture fill rate: 38.4 GTexel / s vs 13 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 823 vs 477
- 9.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13337 vs 1381
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.4 GTexel / s vs 13 GTexel / s |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 823 vs 477 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13337 vs 1381 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 5570
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | ATI Radeon HD 5570 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 477 | 823 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 198 | 47 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1381 | 13337 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.393 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 235.572 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.454 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.345 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.016 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1160 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1883 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3258 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1160 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1883 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3258 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| ATI Radeon HD 5570 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Turks | GT200B |
| Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
| Launch date | 11 October 2011 | 30 March 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 1370 | 1373 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | |
| Price now | $109.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 9.89 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 520.0 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 400 | 192 |
| Texture fill rate | 13 GTexel / s | 38.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 39 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 1,400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 165 mm | 198 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare ATI Radeon HD 5570 with others
ATIRadeon HD 5570 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3800
ATIRadeon HD 5570 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6630M
ATIRadeon HD 5570 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6230
ATIRadeon HD 5570 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K600
ATIRadeon HD 5570 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 820M
ATIRadeon HD 5570 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M255
