ATI Radeon HD 5750 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 5750 and NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 75% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 7.9x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
- 90x more pipelines: 720 vs 8
- 78.8x better floating-point performance: 1,008.0 gflops vs 12.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- 5.8x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 19.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1162 vs 59
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 336 vs 241
- 6.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3347 vs 542
- 6.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3347 vs 542
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 October 2009 vs 9 May 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 720 vs 8 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,008.0 gflops vs 12.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 80 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1162 vs 59 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 336 vs 241 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 vs 542 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 vs 542 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G
- 8.6x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 86 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 86 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 5750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | ATI Radeon HD 5750 | NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1162 | 59 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 336 | 241 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1012 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.384 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 460.31 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.679 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.118 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 53.346 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2124 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1757 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 | 542 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2124 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1757 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 | 542 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| ATI Radeon HD 5750 | NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
| Code name | Juniper | G86 |
| Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
| Launch date | 13 October 2009 | 9 May 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 1212 | 1213 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 700 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,008.0 gflops | 12.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 720 | 8 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 3.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 86 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 / GDDR2 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
| PCI-E 16x | ||
| PowerMizer 7.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare ATI Radeon HD 5750 with others
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 4000
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4600
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8400M G
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5870
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 650M
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645M
