NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M vs ATI Radeon HD 5750

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M and ATI Radeon HD 5750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 36% higher boost clock speed: 950 MHz vs 700 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 91% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 86 Watt
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1205 vs 1166
• 3.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3797 vs 971
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.947 vs 7.384
• Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.982 vs 0.679
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2283 vs 2124
• Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3299 vs 1757
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2283 vs 2124
• Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3299 vs 1757

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5750

• Around 88% higher pipelines: 720 vs 384
• Around 54% better floating-point performance: 1,008.0 gflops vs 652.8 gflops
• 2.6x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 336 vs 238
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 460.31 vs 340.824
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 23.118 vs 18.773
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 53.346 vs 23.111
• Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3347 vs 1913
• Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3347 vs 1913

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5750

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1205 1166
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	238 336
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3797 971
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.947 7.384
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	340.824 460.31
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.982 0.679
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.773 23.118
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23.111 53.346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2283 2124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3299 1757
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1913 3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2283 2124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3299 1757
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1913 3347

Compare specifications (specs)