ATI Radeon HD 5750 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 5750 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 3.8x more pipelines: 720 vs 192
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 1,008.0 gflops vs 462.3 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 26% lower typical power consumption: 86 Watt vs 108 Watt
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1168 vs 825
- 6.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 338 vs 49
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3347 vs 3258
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3347 vs 3258
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 October 2009 vs 30 March 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Pipelines | 720 vs 192 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,008.0 gflops vs 462.3 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 86 Watt vs 108 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1168 vs 825 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 338 vs 49 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 vs 3258 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 vs 3258 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
- Around 52% higher texture fill rate: 38.4 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
- 12.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13337 vs 1039
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.4 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13337 vs 1039 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 5750
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | ATI Radeon HD 5750 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1168 | 825 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 338 | 49 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1039 | 13337 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.384 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 460.31 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.679 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.118 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 53.346 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2124 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1757 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 | 3258 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2124 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1757 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 | 3258 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| ATI Radeon HD 5750 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Juniper | GT200B |
| Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
| Launch date | 13 October 2009 | 30 March 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 1209 | 1363 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | |
| Price now | $109.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 9.89 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 700 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,008.0 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 720 | 192 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 38.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 86 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 178 mm | 198 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare ATI Radeon HD 5750 with others
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9600 PRO Turbo
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
ATIRadeon HD 3870 X2
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9300M G
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6490M
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 625M
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2000
