ATI Radeon HD 5870 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 5870 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5870
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 70% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 4.3x more texture fill rate: 68.0 GTexel / s vs 16 GTexel / s
- 16.7x more pipelines: 1600 vs 96
- 17x better floating-point performance: 2,720.0 gflops vs 160 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 3x more memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 4.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2213 vs 467
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 413 vs 365
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 1820
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 1820
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 September 2009 vs 23 February 2008 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 68.0 GTexel / s vs 16 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1600 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 2,720.0 gflops vs 160 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2213 vs 467 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 413 vs 365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 1820 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 1820 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 188 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt vs 188 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 5870
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | ATI Radeon HD 5870 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2213 | 467 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 413 | 365 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1857 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.789 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1339.688 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.775 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 43.496 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.813 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4541 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3671 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 1820 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4541 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3671 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 1820 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Radeon HD 5870 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
Code name | Cypress | G92 |
Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Launch date | 23 September 2009 | 23 February 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Place in performance rating | 782 | 785 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 850 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,720.0 gflops | 160 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 1600 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 68.0 GTexel / s | 16 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 188 Watt | 70 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
HDCP | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-HE |
Length | 282 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB / s | 51.1 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
Gigathread technology | ||
HDCP-capable | ||
HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
PCI-E 16x | ||
PowerMizer 7.0 |