NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 vs ATI Radeon HD 5870
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 and ATI Radeon HD 5870 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 43% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 850 MHz
- Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 77.7 billion / sec vs 68.0 GTexel / s
- 3x more maximum memory size: 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) vs 1 GB
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3341 vs 2213
- 6.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12811 vs 1857
- Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.921 vs 18.789
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.799 vs 1.775
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.114 vs 43.496
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 24 March 2011 vs 23 September 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 77.7 billion / sec vs 68.0 GTexel / s |
Maximum memory size | 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3341 vs 2213 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12811 vs 1857 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.921 vs 18.789 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.799 vs 1.775 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.114 vs 43.496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 vs 3671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 vs 3671 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5870
- Around 56% higher pipelines: 1600 vs 1024
- Around 9% better floating-point performance: 2,720.0 gflops vs 2x 1,244.2 gflops
- Around 94% lower typical power consumption: 188 Watt vs 365 Watt
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 1707 MHz
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 413 vs 394
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1339.688 vs 1116.126
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 245.813 vs 107.239
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4541 vs 4118
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 3330
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4541 vs 4118
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 3330
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1600 vs 1024 |
Floating-point performance | 2,720.0 gflops vs 2x 1,244.2 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 188 Watt vs 365 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz vs 1707 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 413 vs 394 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1339.688 vs 1116.126 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.813 vs 107.239 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4541 vs 4118 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 3330 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4541 vs 4118 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 3330 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5870
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 | ATI Radeon HD 5870 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3341 | 2213 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 394 | 413 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12811 | 1857 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.921 | 18.789 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1116.126 | 1339.688 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.799 | 1.775 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.114 | 43.496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.239 | 245.813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4118 | 4541 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 3671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3330 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4118 | 4541 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 3671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3330 | 3349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 | ATI Radeon HD 5870 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GF110 | Cypress |
Launch date | 24 March 2011 | 23 September 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | $399 |
Place in performance rating | 779 | 782 |
Price now | $184 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 30.41 | |
Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | 850 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1024 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,244.2 gflops | 2,720.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1600 |
Texture fill rate | 77.7 billion / sec | 68.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 365 Watt | 188 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 2,154 million |
Boost clock speed | 850 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort, Three Dual Link DVI-IMini DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 11" (280 mm) (27.9 cm) | 282 mm |
SLI options | Quad | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 327.7 GB / s | 153.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1707 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround | ||
AMD Eyefinity |