Apple A14 Bionic vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of Apple A14 Bionic and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Apple A14 Bionic
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 16 nm
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7440 vs 3716
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7440 vs 3716
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6721 vs 3357
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6721 vs 3357
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 Oct 2020 vs 10 March 2017 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 16 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7440 vs 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7440 vs 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6721 vs 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6721 vs 3357 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1481 MHz vs 1278 MHz
- 896x more pipelines: 3584 vs 4
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15019 vs 13095
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15019 vs 13095
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1481 MHz vs 1278 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3584 vs 4 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15019 vs 13095 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15019 vs 13095 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Apple A14 Bionic
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Apple A14 Bionic | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13095 | 15019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13095 | 15019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7440 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7440 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6721 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6721 | 3357 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18559 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 937 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 62672 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.837 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2406.499 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.591 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.833 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1002.573 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9870 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Apple A14 Bionic | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Launch date | 23 Oct 2020 | 10 March 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 202 | 201 |
| Architecture | Pascal | |
| Code name | GP102 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
| Price now | $826.98 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 27.48 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1278 MHz | 1481 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 654 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 4 | 3584 |
| Render output units | 16 | |
| Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 11,340 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 91 °C | |
| Texture fill rate | 354.4 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 11,800 million | |
Memory |
||
| Memory bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | 484.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 352 Bit |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-4266 | GDDR5X |
| Maximum RAM amount | 11 GB | |
| Memory clock speed | 11008 MHz | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| PCIe 3.0 | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Apple A14 Bionic with others
AppleA14 Bionic vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
AppleA14 Bionic vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
AppleA14 Bionic vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti
AppleA14 Bionic vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
AppleA14 Bionic vs
AMDRadeon RX 590 GME
AppleA14 Bionic vs
IntelArc A530M
