Apple M1 8-core vs NVIDIA P106-100
Comparative analysis of Apple M1 8-core and NVIDIA P106-100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Apple M1 8-core
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 16 nm
- 12x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3723 vs 1860
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3723 vs 1860
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3364 vs 1680
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3364 vs 1680
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Nov 2020 vs 19 June 2017 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 120 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 vs 1860 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 vs 1860 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 vs 1680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 vs 1680 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P106-100
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1278 MHz
- 160x more pipelines: 1280 vs 8
- Around 92% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36289 vs 18892
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12824 vs 10433
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12824 vs 10433
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 1278 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1280 vs 8 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36289 vs 18892 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12824 vs 10433 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12824 vs 10433 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Apple M1 8-core
GPU 2: NVIDIA P106-100
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Apple M1 8-core | NVIDIA P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18892 | 36289 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10433 | 12824 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10433 | 12824 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 1860 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 1860 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 | 1680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 | 1680 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6541 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 246 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 163.993 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1705.321 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.266 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.32 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 448.036 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4083 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Apple M1 8-core | NVIDIA P106-100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Launch date | 10 Nov 2020 | 19 June 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 423 | 426 |
| Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
| Architecture | Pascal | |
| Code name | GP106 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1278 MHz | 1506 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 650 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5200 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.617 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 8 | 1280 |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Boost clock speed | 1709 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 136.7 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 66.67 GB/s | 192.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-4266 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 250 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Apple M1 8-core with others
AppleM1 8-core vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 350
AppleM1 8-core vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 560v
AppleM1 8-core vs
NVIDIAQuadro 5000M
AppleM1 8-core vs
NVIDIAP106-100
AppleM1 8-core vs
AMDRadeon Pro V340 MxGPU
AppleM1 8-core vs
AppleM1 7-core
