Intel HD Graphics 4000 vs AMD Radeon HD 7570M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4000 and AMD Radeon HD 7570M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
• Around 30% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 500 MHz
• Around 62% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 650 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 194 vs 191
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.712 vs 3.109
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.931 vs 0.333
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 vs 2352
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 vs 2352

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7570M

• 2.9x more texture fill rate: 12 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
• 25x more pipelines: 400 vs 16
• 14.3x better floating-point performance: 480.0 gflops vs 33.6 gflops
• 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 13 Watt vs 45 Watt
• Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 427 vs 347
• 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1095 vs 538
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 199.164 vs 155.638
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.489 vs 7.36
• 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.722 vs 12.009
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 905 vs 754
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1797 vs 1492
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 905 vs 754
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1797 vs 1492

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7570M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	347 427
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	194 191
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	538 1095
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.712 3.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	155.638 199.164
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.931 0.333
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.36 10.489
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.009 42.722
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	754 905
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1492 1797
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2392 2352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	754 905
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1492 1797
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2392 2352

Compare specifications (specs)