Intel HD Graphics 4000 vs Intel HD Graphics 3000
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4000 and Intel HD Graphics 3000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 4.2 GTexel / s vs 1.7 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 16 vs 12
- Around 65% better floating-point performance: 33.6 gflops vs 20.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 347 vs 261
- 5.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 194 vs 35
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1492 vs 1137
- 23.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 vs 101
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1492 vs 1137
- 23.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 vs 101
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 14 May 2012 vs 1 February 2011 |
| Texture fill rate | 4.2 GTexel / s vs 1.7 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 16 vs 12 |
| Floating-point performance | 33.6 gflops vs 20.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 32 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 347 vs 261 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 194 vs 35 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1492 vs 1137 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 vs 101 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1492 vs 1137 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 vs 101 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 3000
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1050 MHz
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4000
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 3000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | Intel HD Graphics 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 347 | 261 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 194 | 35 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 538 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.712 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 155.638 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.931 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.36 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.009 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 754 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1492 | 1137 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 | 101 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 754 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1492 | 1137 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 | 101 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 4000 | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.0 | Generation 6.0 |
| Code name | Ivy Bridge GT2 | Sandy Bridge GT2 |
| Launch date | 14 May 2012 | 1 February 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 1501 | 1604 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 33.6 gflops | 20.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 32 nm |
| Pipelines | 16 | 12 |
| Texture fill rate | 4.2 GTexel / s | 1.7 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 1,200 million | 995 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.1 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.0 | 3.1 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||

