Intel HD Graphics 4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4000 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 347 vs 322
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 194 vs 131
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.712 vs 2.471
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 155.638 vs 77.99
- 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.931 vs 0.233
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 7.36 vs 6.018
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 12.009 vs 4.053
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 754 vs 555
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1492 vs 835
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 vs 1155
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 754 vs 555
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1492 vs 835
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 vs 1155
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 14 May 2012 vs 2 April 2012 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 40 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 347 vs 322 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 194 vs 131 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.712 vs 2.471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 155.638 vs 77.99 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.931 vs 0.233 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.36 vs 6.018 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.009 vs 4.053 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 754 vs 555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1492 vs 835 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 vs 1155 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 754 vs 555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1492 vs 835 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 vs 1155 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 55% higher texture fill rate: 6.5 billion / sec vs 4.2 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 48 vs 16
- 4.6x better floating-point performance: 155.5 gflops vs 33.6 gflops
- Around 55% lower typical power consumption: 29 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1283 vs 538
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 6.5 billion / sec vs 4.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 48 vs 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 155.5 gflops vs 33.6 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt vs 45 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1283 vs 538 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 347 | 322 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 194 | 131 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 538 | 1283 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.712 | 2.471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 155.638 | 77.99 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.931 | 0.233 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.36 | 6.018 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.009 | 4.053 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 754 | 555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1492 | 835 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 | 1155 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 754 | 555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1492 | 835 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 | 1155 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 87 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | Ivy Bridge GT2 | GF119 |
| Launch date | 14 May 2012 | 2 April 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1501 | 1626 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $39.99 | |
| Price now | $39.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 10.13 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 810 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 33.6 gflops | 155.5 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 16 | 48 |
| Texture fill rate | 4.2 GTexel / s | 6.5 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 29 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,200 million | 292 million |
| CUDA cores | 48 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 102 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Height | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.1 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.0 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1024 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| CUDA | ||
