Intel HD Graphics 4000 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 4000 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 347 versus 322
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 194 versus 131
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.712 versus 2.471
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 155.638 versus 77.99
- 4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.931 versus 0.233
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 7.36 versus 6.018
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 12.009 versus 4.053
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 754 versus 555
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1492 versus 835
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 versus 1155
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 754 versus 555
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1492 versus 835
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 versus 1155
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 14 May 2012 versus 2 April 2012 |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 40 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 347 versus 322 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 194 versus 131 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.712 versus 2.471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 155.638 versus 77.99 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.931 versus 0.233 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.36 versus 6.018 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.009 versus 4.053 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 754 versus 555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1492 versus 835 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 versus 1155 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 754 versus 555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1492 versus 835 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 versus 1155 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
- Environ 25% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 810 MHz versus 650 MHz
- Environ 55% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 6.5 billion / sec versus 4.2 GTexel / s
- 3x plus de pipelines: 48 versus 16
- 4.6x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 155.5 gflops versus 33.6 gflops
- Environ 55% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 29 Watt versus 45 Watt
- 2.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 1283 versus 538
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz versus 650 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 6.5 billion / sec versus 4.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 48 versus 16 |
| Performance á point flottant | 155.5 gflops versus 33.6 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt versus 45 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1283 versus 538 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 347 | 322 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 194 | 131 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 538 | 1283 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.712 | 2.471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 155.638 | 77.99 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.931 | 0.233 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.36 | 6.018 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.009 | 4.053 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 754 | 555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1492 | 835 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 | 1155 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 754 | 555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1492 | 835 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 | 1155 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 87 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Ivy Bridge GT2 | GF119 |
| Date de sortie | 14 May 2012 | 2 April 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1501 | 1626 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $39.99 | |
| Prix maintenant | $39.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.13 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 650 MHz | 810 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 33.6 gflops | 155.5 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 16 | 48 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 4.2 GTexel / s | 6.5 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 29 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,200 million | 292 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 48 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 102 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Hauteur | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 11.1 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.0 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| RAM maximale | 1024 MB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1.8 GB/s | |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| CUDA | ||
