Intel HD Graphics 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 400
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4000 and NVIDIA Quadro 400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 44% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 450 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 347 vs 148
- 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 194 vs 59
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 vs 1103
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 vs 1103
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 May 2012 vs 5 April 2011 |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 347 vs 148 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 194 vs 59 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 vs 1103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 vs 1103 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 400
- Around 71% higher texture fill rate: 7.2 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 48 vs 16
- 3.2x better floating-point performance: 108 gflops vs 33.6 gflops
- Around 41% lower typical power consumption: 32 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 8.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4630 vs 538
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 7.2 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 48 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 108 gflops vs 33.6 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 32 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4630 vs 538 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 400
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | NVIDIA Quadro 400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 347 | 148 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 194 | 59 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 538 | 4630 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.712 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 155.638 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.931 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.36 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.009 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 754 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1492 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 | 1103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 754 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1492 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 | 1103 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 4000 | NVIDIA Quadro 400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Ivy Bridge GT2 | GT216 |
Launch date | 14 May 2012 | 5 April 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1501 | 1614 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | |
Price now | $145.55 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.13 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 450 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 33.6 gflops | 108 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 4.2 GTexel / s | 7.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 32 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,200 million | 486 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 163 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.1 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.0 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 12.32 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1540 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |