Intel HD Graphics 4400 vs AMD Radeon HD 7670M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4400 and AMD Radeon HD 7670M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel HD Graphics 4400

AMD Radeon HD 7670M

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 523 vs 470
3.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 276 vs 84
Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2142 vs 1407
3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.844 vs 2.47

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	3 September 2013 vs 17 February 2012
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm vs 40 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	523 vs 470
PassMark - G2D Mark	276 vs 84
Geekbench - OpenCL	2142 vs 1407
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	7.844 vs 2.47

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7670M

Around 71% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 350 MHz
3.1x more texture fill rate: 14.4 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
24x more pipelines: 480 vs 20
12.5x better floating-point performance: 576.0 gflops vs 46 gflops
Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 210.901 vs 154.696
Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1228 vs 817
Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2194 vs 1381
Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3341 vs 3044
Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1228 vs 817
Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2194 vs 1381
Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3341 vs 3044

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	600 MHz vs 350 MHz
Texture fill rate	14.4 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	480 vs 20
Floating-point performance	576.0 gflops vs 46 gflops
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	210.901 vs 154.696
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1228 vs 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2194 vs 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3341 vs 3044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1228 vs 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2194 vs 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3341 vs 3044

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4400
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7670M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

523

470

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

276

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

2142

1407

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7.844

2.47

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

154.696

210.901

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

817

1228

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1381

2194

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3044

3341

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

817

1228

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1381

2194

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3044

3341

Name	Intel HD Graphics 4400	AMD Radeon HD 7670M
PassMark - G3D Mark	523	470
PassMark - G2D Mark	276	84
Geekbench - OpenCL	2142	1407
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	7.844	2.47
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	154.696	210.901
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	9.084
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	8.335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	817	1228
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1381	2194
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3044	3341
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	817	1228
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1381	2194
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3044	3341
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	152	0

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel HD Graphics 4400	AMD Radeon HD 7670M
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 7.5	TeraScale 2
Code name	Haswell GT2	Thames
Launch date	3 September 2013	17 February 2012
Place in performance rating	1420	1423
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Launch price (MSRP)		$629.99
Price now		$629.99
Value for money (0-100)		1.48
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz
Core clock speed	350 MHz	600 MHz
Floating-point performance	46 gflops	576.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	20	480
Texture fill rate	4.6 GTexel / s	14.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	20 Watt	20 Watt
Transistor count	392 million	716 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.3	4.4
Memory
Memory bus width	64 / 128 Bit	128 Bit
Shared memory	1	0
Maximum RAM amount		2 GB
Memory bandwidth		28.8 GB / s
Memory clock speed		1800 MHz
Memory type		DDR3, (GDDR5)
Technologies
Quick Sync