AMD Radeon R7 M265 vs Intel HD Graphics 4400

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M265 and Intel HD Graphics 4400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M265

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• 2.6x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 4.3x more texture fill rate: 19.8 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
• 19.2x more pipelines: 384 vs 20
• 13.8x better floating-point performance: 633.6 gflops vs 46 gflops
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 546 vs 522
• 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5587 vs 2143
• Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.031 vs 7.844
• Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 282.111 vs 154.696
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.455 vs 0.958
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.704 vs 9.084
• 8.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 68.392 vs 8.335
• Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1551 vs 817
• Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1551 vs 817

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400

• Around 39% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 825 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
• 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 277 vs 138
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1381 vs 1264
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3044 vs 2424
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1381 vs 1264
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3044 vs 2424

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M265
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4400

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	546 522
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	138 277
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5587 2143
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.031 7.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	282.111 154.696
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.455 0.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.704 9.084
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	68.392 8.335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1551 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1264 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2424 3044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1551 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1264 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2424 3044

Compare specifications (specs)